Watching PGA Tour golf is something that every (even semi) serious golfer ends up doing at some point during the regular season.  Like the talking heads on ESPN and the Golf Channel, every armchair caddy has an opinion on every golfer.  When I began watching golf 3+ years ago, I disliked Jim Furyk’s game.  He always seemed out-of-place for some reason.  Nearly always finishing in the top 10, but never really being in contention.  Super consistent, but with a swing that was once compared by David Feherty to “a squid falling slowly out of a tree.”  I just didn’t understand how someone who always placed in the top 10 could never get the W.  His game is not particularly dynamic, nor does he really have the presence of some of his counterparts.  I’ll admit, having some personality on the course makes me like a golfer, and this was not Mr. Furyk’s strong suit.  Nothing about Mr. Furyk’s game made sense to me:  the double overlap grip?  The insanely long putting routine?  come on!

How could someone who falls well below tour driving distance (Jim 276 – Tour 287) compete so successfully on courses that push 7200 yards every week?  How could someone with a swing that no professional instructor would dare mess with get a diagnosis when he’s running cold?  How could, in short, someone who totally defies the modern image of a Tour professional compete with the power hitters and short game artists that populate the PGA roster?

The answer came to me as I watched this season’s FedEx Cup playoffs:  Furyk understands his particular game better than anyone.  Earlier I mentioned that Jim does not hit the ball as far as most Tour pros.  Now on a good day, this disadvantage is neutralized by pure ball-striking, but what about the bad days?  If you’re consistently hitting the ball 15-20 yards short of your “average” playing partners,” how can you possibly compete on courses that are Tour length?  You don’t have to be a mathematician to realize that tour pros have bad days like everyone, but they all seem to keep their scores impressively low.  Perhaps what has impressed me most is that Furyk can keep up to this lofty professional standard while barely being within squinting distance of the likes of Bubba Watson or Dustin Johnson.

I recently read an article Furyk wrote about course management and understanding your own game.  His principles have really resonated with me, and hopefully will help me break 80 this year.  When Furyk’s having a bad day, he’s still hitting fairways and greens.  When he’s not hitting greens, he’s left himself the most reasonable chip or pitch to the hole.  In a word,  Jim is a grinder.  Like you, my really good playing days on the course are not as numerous as my “damn that should have been a 4” days.  What Jim has shown me is that it is possible to hit the ball 270 yards and have a real shot at par.  While we can’t all hit the ball a country mile, we can all take a thoughtful look at our own games and figure out what works for us.

What I was unable to appreciate before was the slow, methodical game.  I did not understand why Furyk would not change something in his game to try to hit the ball further or work the ball a different way.  This year with three victories, the FedEx cup, $10 million, and likely Player of the Year honors, I now understand the value of playing your own game.

See what Jim said to change my mind,  I hope it’ll help you out too.

http://www.golf.com/golf/instruction/article/0,28136,1664671,00.html

 

TPC Las Vegas (Part II)

October 6, 2010

Please bear with us while we experiment with the layout and exactly how to format our posts.

Another one of our goals is to juxtapose not only our personal views of the various items we post about, but also our views in light of our handicaps.  As the resident hack (a rather bloated 10.7 to JK’s 0.3 (?) ), my opinion will clearly resonate more with the masses.

As mentioned before, this was not our first crack at TPC Las Vegas.  I recall two shots in particular from the first trip with particular fondness.  Winds reached nearly 35 mph — seriously, we quit after 7 holes because of it.  The first was my approach (likely 4th or 5 shot not counting penalties) into par-five 6th.  With a stout cross wind, I cut a 5-iron about 135 yards into the green to about 7 feet.  Even JK was impressed.  The second was the tee shot on the par-three 7th.  Playing directly into the now 40 mph wind, JK and I both drew driver (209 for him, 195 for me).  After watching two towering draws become two hooks because of the wind, I drew back and nailed what is certainly one of the best drives I have ever hit in my life.  Not even a hair off-line, that bridgestone took off straight as a string and cut through the wind.  It is somewhat fitting that it would only go 193 yards (that’s golf, right?).  It was one of those shots that took felt so good that I could only smile after a ridiculous 4-putt.

Anyway, back to the post-bar round.

First, things I like to know about a course in a review:

From the tees that I played (Tips): 7080 yds – 73.4/136 – Par 71
Green size: average to small
length of par 3’s – 196, 209, 145, 202
Shortest par 4 and 5 – 349 and 544
Number of par 3’s/4’s/5’s –  4/11/3

Second, snapshot of the course:

Style/Architect:  Desert course/Bobby Weed & Raymond Floyd
prettiest hole: 18 –  Water left makes this a bear too!
most difficult hole: 8 – Long and plays into the prevailing wind.  This hole calls for a draw off the tee and a very strong second shot uphill into a two-tier green.  Be sure to avoid a deep bunker short and one to the left.  Going long is not an option as you’ll be using that desert club that JK mentioned.
best hole to gamble on: 2 – while it cards in at a stout 196, the true beauty of this downhill par three is that it can play 20 yards above or below that number depending on the wind.  Trust your club selection and don’t go left.

While I will normally strive to write the narrative of my review from the perspective of a 10-handicapper who works on his game more than he should given his profession, I must confess that shooting a good score was unequivocally the last thing on my mind while playing this round.  Having just finished the bar exam and beginning the summer of true freedom that I would have for the foreseeable future, I was dead set on having a good time and enjoying the amazing weather.  That attitude notwithstanding,  I played several of the holes remarkably well.  I’m happy to report that even from the tips, I managed to play the par 3’s at even par.  I may have had to venture into the desert on a number of the par 4s and the par-five 4th (a few times), but am happy to report that I finished the round in high spirits and with an even higher score of 89.

Part of the charm of this course was that it generally followed the natural lay of the land.  A particular feature to note was the large gorge that divided the 14th and 15th holes.  For a 10 handicapper, this course presents not only a challenge off the tee (many forced carries and blind tee shots), but also a strong test for your short game.  For those aiming to play for score, my personal recommendation for the 10-handicapper who’s Achilles heel is the driver is to play either the blue tees (6769 – 71.0/128) or the men’s blended (68.7/128) and stick to the trusty 3-wood.  For those who’s chipping and putting leads to inflated scores, spending a little time on the putting green to get used to the crazy speed on these greens is must.  You’re in luck, you get full use of the amazing practice facilities all day when you purchase your tee time.  Also, for even the 10-handicapper with an above average short-game, the bunkers on this course tend to be more punitive than most.  Avoid at all costs.  One more bit of local knowledge:  play in the morning.  The wind kicks up in the afternoon.

Other tidbits:

Pro shop: top of the line – as you would expect from a PGA Tour owned facility
Distance from attractions – about 20 minutes away from the middle of Las Vegas Blvd
Deals/Specials:  JK and I managed to get tee times for $199 including a pair of Adidas golf shoes (then valued at $85).  We even called ahead and got to order the exact colors and size (issue for those of us wearing 14 or larger) we wanted.
Make sure you grab a yardage book for this course from the pro shop.  Not only is it immensely useful on the par 5’s and the dog-leg par 4’s, it’s a nice keepsake to remember your round. You can also you use it to write well-informed blog entries (or comments to ours!).

18th Tee.  JK on the left, LG on the right.

Play of the week 1

October 6, 2010

One of our goals in writing this blog is to keep the content relevant to world of golf as it exists today.  In this spirit, we proudly unveil our first regular (or at least whenever we feel like posting it) feature:  The Play of the Week

This week’s monster move comes straight from Wales during the 2010 playing of the Ryder Cup.

Now, given that I’m a die-hard Tiger fan, JK might immediately think that Tiger’s crazy awesome hole-out on 12 tops my list of memorable moments.  Admittedly, on any given Sunday, that would just do it for me.  (133 yards to the bottom of the cup!)

This week, however, top honors go to none other than a Georgia Tech Alum who displayed one of the greatest pieces of gamesmanship that I have witnessed in this great game.  Stewart Cink, with the aid of his trusty peanut butter and jelly sandwich, took a full 2 minutes and 20 seconds to knock back an easy 30 footer (HA!) and ice out Rory McIlroy and Graeme McDowell.  Even his playing partner (and fellow yellow jacket), Matt Kuchar, seemed confused by the delay.

Here’s to you, Stu!  Way to mess with those Euros.  We’ll get them next time, Boys.